|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
The Cost of Critical Care Economic Analysis |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Most worthwhile economic evaluations in the critical care literature feature CEAs or CUAs. A structured paradigm along evidence based lines is necessary for appraisal of these studies. Chalfin [1998] describes eight steps in analysing a cost effectiveness study:
The Evidence Based Medicine in Critical Care Group have adapted this method and added classic critical appraisal questions. The following comes from Heyland and Cook (1999):
I. Are
the results valid?
II. What
were the results?
III. Will
the results help in caring for my patients?
Both systems ask the same questions, but Chalfin’s second point is worth looking at: what exactly is the perspective of the study, that is – who exactly is represented by the study? An intervention which may be cost effective for one segment of society may be not so for another (e.g. cancer screening – the risk may vary from one group to another). It is conventional for CEAs to take a societal perspective, that is, the costs and benefits accrue to society as a whole. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Please note: these tutorials are for personal study purposes only. They are not currently peer reviewed, and no responsibility will be taken for mistakes or inaccuracies. Reproduction of information is forbidden. All material is copyrighted by the GasWorks Group. |
|||||||||